-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
(closes #279) Remove Arguments.dofs and generally improve code coverage #3258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3258 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.91% 99.95% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 376 376
Lines 53522 53485 -37
==========================================
- Hits 53477 53463 -14
+ Misses 45 22 -23 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@arporter This is ready for review. It brings the codecov misses from 45 to 27 and adds no-cover pragmas to the remaining (maybe you know how to do better in the remaining?). I also added a more strict reporting for deleted lines (indirect changes). |
arporter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks very much for tackling this Sergi.
There are a couple of cases where I think we can add tests rather than no-cover pragmas. Also, you've removed some validation code from ACCEnterDataTrans and I don't understand why.
src/psyclone/tests/psyir/frontend/fparser2_program_handler_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@arporter This is ready for another look. |
arporter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Sergi. Apart from the need to put back (or discuss) the check for different asynch. queues in EnterData, this is pretty much ready to go now. I see the integration tests were all OK previously so won't re-run them now.
arporter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All looks good now, thanks Sergi.
As master has now moved on, I'll re-run the IT and then proceed to merge.
|
IT were all green. I'll update the changelog and proceed to merge. |
No description provided.