Skip to content

Improvement/S3UTILS-217/list objects by replication status.js v2#370

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/1.17from
improvement/S3UTILS-217/listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js-v2
Jan 28, 2026
Merged

Improvement/S3UTILS-217/list objects by replication status.js v2#370
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/1.17from
improvement/S3UTILS-217/listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js-v2

Conversation

@scality-gdoumergue
Copy link
Contributor

PR targeting the development/1.17 branch. The code and tests were already approved and merged into dev/1.

- Show details of the errors when they happen
- Display the bucket's name
- Display the IsLatest field
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

Hello scality-gdoumergue,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue S3UTILS-217 contains:

  • 1.18.0

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 1.17.3

  • 1.18.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of S3UTILS-217, or the target
branch of this pull request.

1 similar comment
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue S3UTILS-217 contains:

  • 1.18.0

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 1.17.3

  • 1.18.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of S3UTILS-217, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jan 28, 2026
@scality-gdoumergue
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.13
  • development/1.14
  • development/1.15
  • development/1.16
  • development/1.4
  • development/1.7

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/1.17

  • ✔️ development/1

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.13
  • development/1.14
  • development/1.15
  • development/1.16
  • development/1.4
  • development/1.7

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 28, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/1.17

  • ✔️ development/1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/1.13
  • development/1.14
  • development/1.15
  • development/1.16
  • development/1.4
  • development/1.7

Please check the status of the associated issue S3UTILS-217.

Goodbye scality-gdoumergue.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 4f077be into development/1.17 Jan 28, 2026
22 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/S3UTILS-217/listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js-v2 branch January 28, 2026 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants