Skip to content

Improvement/cldsrv 848 add missing checksum algorithms#6081

Draft
leif-scality wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopment/9.2from
improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms
Draft

Improvement/cldsrv 848 add missing checksum algorithms#6081
leif-scality wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopment/9.2from
improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms

Conversation

@leif-scality
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 17, 2026

Hello leif-scality,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 17, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-848 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.2.29

  • 9.3.3

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-848, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms branch from 5c6e2cd to 7498887 Compare February 17, 2026 21:56
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.87500% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.19%. Comparing base (9b836b8) to head (3bbcf8a).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/api/api.js 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
lib/api/apiUtils/integrity/validateChecksums.js 98.27% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Config.js 79.37% <ø> (ø)
lib/api/api.js 89.53% <83.33%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
lib/api/apiUtils/integrity/validateChecksums.js 98.66% <98.27%> (-1.34%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.2    #6081      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            84.17%   84.19%   +0.02%     
===================================================
  Files                  204      204              
  Lines                13124    13177      +53     
===================================================
+ Hits                 11047    11095      +48     
- Misses                2077     2082       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 67.46% <39.06%> (-0.16%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 28.10% <12.50%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.68% <39.06%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.69% <39.06%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 35.21% <34.37%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
sur-tests 35.72% <34.37%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
sur-tests-inflights 37.57% <34.37%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unit 69.81% <96.87%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 34.47% <34.37%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms branch 2 times, most recently from e519604 to 12f1006 Compare February 18, 2026 17:17
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 18, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-848 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.2.29

  • 9.3.4

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-848, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms branch from 12f1006 to f318abb Compare February 18, 2026 19:15
@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-848-add-missing-checksum-algorithms branch from f318abb to 3bbcf8a Compare February 18, 2026 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments