Fix instance capabilities in report

[francoisferrand]

We create a Set when loading the config (to avoid costly looking),
but this must not modify the capabilities which are returned by
reportHandler.

Issue: CLDSRV-850

[bert-e]

Hello francoisferrand,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options

name	description	privileged	authored
/after_pull_request	Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval	Bypass the pull request author's approval	⭐
/bypass_build_status	Bypass the build and test status	⭐
/bypass_commit_size	Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA	⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch	Bypass the check on the source branch prefix	⭐
/bypass_jira_check	Bypass the Jira issue check	⭐
/bypass_peer_approval	Bypass the pull request peers' approval	⭐
/bypass_leader_approval	Bypass the pull request leaders' approval	⭐
/approve	Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request.		✍️
/create_pull_requests	Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches	Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus	Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity	Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait	Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.

Available commands

name	description	privileged
/help	Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status	Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear	Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset	Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset	Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.79%. Comparing base (f30c524) to head (4aac273).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.1.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/Config.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/utilities/reportHandler.js	69.26% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/Config.js	78.88% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.1    #6080      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            83.77%   83.79%   +0.02%     
===================================================
  Files                  191      191              
  Lines                12350    12350              
===================================================
+ Hits                 10346    10349       +3     
+ Misses                2004     2001       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests	66.88% <10.00%> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests	27.02% <0.00%> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests	68.20% <10.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
mongo-v1-ft-tests	68.19% <10.00%> (ø)
multiple-backend	34.27% <0.00%> (ø)
sur-tests	35.42% <0.00%> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights	36.51% <0.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
unit	69.66% <90.00%> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests	33.40% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[bert-e]

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

[francoisferrand]

/approve

[bert-e]

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

• the author

• 2 peers

The following options are set: approve

[francoisferrand]

/bypass_peer_approval

[bert-e]

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

• ✔️ development/9.1

• ✔️ development/9.2

• ✔️ development/9.3

The following branches have NOT changed:

• development/7.10
• development/7.4
• development/7.70
• development/8.8
• development/9.0

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-850.

Goodbye francoisferrand.

The following options are set: bypass_peer_approval, approve