Conversation
c6b6e07 to
948a5da
Compare
…y libvips42 on Debian-based systems
948a5da to
2054254
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Additional library search paths for #211
The
libvips42package, which only contains runtime libraries, does not symlink in to places we currently search.System.mapLibraryNameisn't compatible with the path used by this package (/usr/lib/whatever/libvips.so.42), so we can add another search whilst skipping this name mapping. It goes at the end to not change any existing search behaviour.