Conversation
Collaborator
|
@alxmrs Maybe we can wait until they are back online and do a POC to check their server outbound bandwidth. WDYT ? |
Contributor
Author
|
That's sounds very reasonable to me. Good insight. |
Contributor
Author
|
@mahrsee1997 @ksic8 Let's revisit this CL now that ECMWF is back online. |
373c581 to
8155892
Compare
074025d to
8fb7af1
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This LGTM -- I cannot approve this CL since I am also an author. |
fredzyda
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2023
Collaborator
fredzyda
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can approve it if Alex can't.
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks Fred! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm taking a leaf from @mahrsee1997's PR #148 so that we can copy data from the MARS server faster (using a larger buffer size).
Thanks for the primary contribution here, Rahul.