Fixed issue in heatmap.2 that made plotting large heatmaps very slow#2
Open
ChristophH wants to merge 1 commit intocran:masterfrom
Open
Fixed issue in heatmap.2 that made plotting large heatmaps very slow#2ChristophH wants to merge 1 commit intocran:masterfrom
ChristophH wants to merge 1 commit intocran:masterfrom
Conversation
…st even when Rowv or Colv were set to NA, FALSE, or NULL
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem was that dendrograms were calculated using hclust and dist even when Rowv or Colv were set to NA, FALSE, or NULL. This made plotting large heatmaps very slow. What was the purpose of that code in the first place? And if there was a good reason for these blocks, why use hclust and not hclustfun (and dist and not distfun)?