-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
sync cibuildwheel test env with uv #2913
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kevinjqliu
wants to merge
8
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
kevinjqliu:kevinjqliu/fix-nightly
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+7
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7d6ac3
fix quoting
kevinjqliu e9fd5c4
do we need sqlalchemy?
kevinjqliu 01f5690
lets try uv
kevinjqliu 070e536
include sqlalchemy in dev dep
kevinjqliu 2d44374
update uv lock
kevinjqliu 42f72a0
try uv sync
kevinjqliu b33abd6
uv run pytest
kevinjqliu f1409e1
relative path
kevinjqliu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This uv usage in the build wheels is a great addition! Now the CIBW dependencies won't need to be manually updated and can be kept in sync with the pyproject versions.
I believe this command will use the entire list of dependencies in the dev group. I think here or as a followup we could create a minimal
wheel-testdependency group in the pyproject file with just pytest, moto, pytest-lazy-fixture, and sqlalchemy. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yea good point! on the flip side, we're not currently using the
devgroup for running unit tests 😆 we install all depsiceberg-python/Makefile
Lines 72 to 73 in 9ab4f04
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
id prefer to sync more deps than less, esp since any deps can be added to conftest.py that will be used here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense to use all deps for the make command.
Looking at it more closely there is sort of gray area of what is covered in the
Makefilevs what is covered in CI. Should build logic be moved to theMakefileand then used in CI instead of being defined separately? (not a blocker for this PR)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, with our current infra today we won't need to figure out the CI deps is missing an entry with nightly if we just build all-extras. If CI runtime ever becomes a concern we can try out something like this.
As for the Makefile, I think the current setup is mostly helpful on the development and release side of things