-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
fix: Fix to_json handling of NaN and Infinity values (#3016) #3018
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Brijesh-Thakkar
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
Brijesh-Thakkar:fix-to-json-infinity
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't reviewed this in detail yet, but it seems odd to handle these values after they have already been converted to strings. Could the check not happen when converting float to string instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that handling this earlier would be preferable in general. In this case, to_json delegates primitive type handling to spark_cast, and the goal here was to avoid changing spark_cast behavior globally since it is used by other expressions where preserving "NaN" / "Infinity" string output may be expected.
Normalizing the values at the to_json layer keeps the change scoped specifically to JSON semantics while still aligning the output with Spark’s behavior.
That said, I’m happy to move the check earlier or adjust the approach if you think handling this during float-to-string conversion would be more appropriate for Comet
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andygrove for more details, run the unit tests from this pull request: #3011
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Brijesh-Thakkar and @kazantsev-maksim. I will review this PR more carefully today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked out this branch locally and then merged the changes from #3011 and saw different results from Spark and Comet for infinity:
Let's get the unit tests merged first and then pull them into this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spark doesn't follow the JSON spec: