Skip to content

Add ciblex carrier with api v2#180

Closed
paradoxxxzero wants to merge 4 commits intopydanticfrom
ciblex
Closed

Add ciblex carrier with api v2#180
paradoxxxzero wants to merge 4 commits intopydanticfrom
ciblex

Conversation

@paradoxxxzero
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero force-pushed the ciblex branch 2 times, most recently from f02b2ca to 390b259 Compare September 11, 2024 14:19
@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero force-pushed the ciblex branch 2 times, most recently from 0d1ed35 to fd21200 Compare September 17, 2024 15:11
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (pydantic@7879c3b). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
roulier/carriers/ciblex/carrier.py 89.18% 8 Missing ⚠️
roulier/carriers/ciblex/tests/test_ciblex.py 92.85% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             pydantic     #180   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage            ?   69.77%           
===========================================
  Files               ?      114           
  Lines               ?     3887           
  Branches            ?        0           
===========================================
  Hits                ?     2712           
  Misses              ?     1175           
  Partials            ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero changed the title Add ciblex transporter (with new pydantic api) Add ciblex carrier with api v2 Sep 17, 2024
@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2025 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants