-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Add Standards/scs-0104-v2-standard-images.md #989
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Should the image_source format always be from the osism repository or should we not be able to host our own images? |
This is up for debate. So far, this hasn't come up. If other people want to host the image, they can probably be added, given that the relevant bodies agree. |
garloff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another comment:
We've had standardized image names before. Shouldn't we keep them as a recommendation? This would reduce the chance for breakage of customer automation ...
2991d81 to
f0b72ff
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have updated the link to the new SCS website.
I focused on formalities in the review. Someone else should check again contentwise and resolve the open conversations.
5e28c16 to
74d2a30
Compare
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Co-authored-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Frommhold <depressiveRobot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
b2b04fa to
20662fc
Compare
|
I think this draft(!) has seen enough scrutiny for a first merge. We still need to supply tests, though. |
Closes #933