-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Swap to using 'get_node_ids' that may be sharded or fetch a split, etc #467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
/unit_test_py |
|
/integration_test |
|
/e2e_test |
GiGL Automation@ 17:56:25UTC : 🔄 @ 19:10:59UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
GiGL Automation@ 17:56:36UTC : 🔄 |
GiGL Automation@ 17:56:55UTC : 🔄 @ 19:17:55UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
|
/unit_test_py |
|
/integration_test |
|
/e2e_test |
GiGL Automation@ 23:31:16UTC : 🔄 @ 24:39:48UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
GiGL Automation@ 23:31:19UTC : 🔄 |
GiGL Automation@ 23:31:21UTC : 🔄 @ 24:55:47UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
|
/unit_test_py |
|
/integration_test |
GiGL Automation@ 23:32:48UTC : 🔄 @ 24:51:43UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
GiGL Automation@ 23:32:52UTC : 🔄 |
Scope of work done
Per discussion in #438, migrating to some
get_node_idswhich is more flexible and can fetch a split and optionally shard, etc.Additionally, breaking out the dataset building utils to their own (tested) file,
tests/test_assets/distributed/test_dataset.pyand then creatingremote_dist_dataset_test.pyas unit tests for RDI.Where is the documentation for this feature?: N/A
Did you add automated tests or write a test plan?
Updated Changelog.md? NO
Ready for code review?: NO