WIP leveled_bookie:status/1

[hmmr]

This implements martinsumner#478.

When called here, it returns a map containing reportable items described in the issue above.

(dev2@127.0.0.1)12> riak_kv_vnode:vnode_status(riak_core_vnode_manager:all_index_pid(riak_kv_vnode)).
[{1347321821914426127719021955160323408745312813056,
  [{backend_status,riak_kv_leveled_backend,
                   #{ledger_cache_size => 4,
                     journal_last_compaction_result => {0,0.0},
                     get_sample_count => 0,get_body_time => 0,
                     head_sample_count => 0,head_rsp_time => 0,
                     put_sample_count => 0,put_prep_time => 0,put_ink_time => 0,
                     put_mem_time => 0}},
   {vnodeid,<<"}ÍyرYdå">>},
   {counter,140003},
   {counter_lease,150000},
   {counter_lease_size,10000},
   {counter_leasing,false}]},
...

Not all items can be available at the time of calling, in which case the backend_status will not include the corresponding keys.

In riak_control, the results will show as follows:

[hmmr]

Marking as WIP pending work on the last item ("Mean level for recent fetches").

[martinsumner]

Can we add a test to the ct tests, or perhaps just extend one of the tests in basic_SUITE.

It would be good to verify that the results returned are as expected. Some may just need to be range checked, but you can get the PIDs of the Inker/Penciller via leveled_bookie:book_returnactors/1 to absolutely verify things like the penciller cache size.

Obviously fails the coverage check at the moment as book_status/1 is never called:

|------------------------|------------|
  |                module  |  coverage  |
  |------------------------|------------|
  |        leveled_bookie  |       99%  |
  |           leveled_cdb  |      100%  |
  |         leveled_codec  |      100%  |
  |        leveled_ebloom  |      100%  |
  |          leveled_eval  |      100%  |
  |        leveled_filter  |      100%  |
  |          leveled_head  |      100%  |
  |        leveled_iclerk  |      100%  |
  |     leveled_imanifest  |      100%  |
  |         leveled_inker  |      100%  |
  |           leveled_log  |      100%  |
  |       leveled_monitor  |       97%  |
  |        leveled_pclerk  |      100%  |
  |     leveled_penciller  |      100%  |
  |     leveled_pmanifest  |      100%  |
  |          leveled_pmem  |      100%  |
  |        leveled_runner  |      100%  |
  |         leveled_setop  |      100%  |
  |           leveled_sst  |      100%  |
  |      leveled_sstblock  |      100%  |
  |        leveled_tictac  |      100%  |
  |          leveled_tree  |      100%  |
  |          leveled_util  |      100%  |
  |------------------------|------------|
  |                 total  |       99%  |
  |------------------------|------------|

There are tests in basic_SUITE that prompt journal compaction, so you cna follow the pattern to check results are expected after a compaction.

[martinsumner]

The PUT will call leveled_monitor:maybe_time/2 - so sometimes it will be timed, and sometimes not. So I'm not sure that the test will pass reliably.

I do think it should try a number of operations, so that we can check all the values change to the right order of magnitude. There are a lot of load functions, or you can add a fetch and validation of the book status into one of the other tests.

Also, what happened to reporting the journal compaction scores and results?

[martinsumner]

containing

[martinsumner]

A proplist or a map?

[martinsumner]

If there has been no compaction, is there no report on compaction? Would it not be better to consistently sure all keys exist, but have them set to a default value when they haven't occurred.

[martinsumner]

dialyzer spec required.

By default, in leveled, we try to avoid passing the LoopState to functions outside of the standard handle_call/caast/info functions. I would probably do this within the handle_call rather than have it as a separate function - as it is just a function based on knowledge of #state, and there's not separate testing of the function. [in this case there would be no need for a dialyzer spec]