Release/v4.210.0 #24
Release/v4.210.0 #24
Conversation
Fixes 90% miss rate by converting .ext to *.ext patterns - Automatically converts file patterns like .ts to *.ts for ripgrep's --glob - Preserves existing glob patterns like *.ts or **/*.ts - Defaults to * when no pattern provided Resolves issue where ripgrep's --glob parameter expects proper glob patterns but users were passing just file extensions
ContextSummary By MatterAI
🔄 What ChangedIntroduced a comprehensive AI Code Review feature that allows users to analyze uncommitted git changes directly within the IDE. This includes a new 🔍 Impact of the ChangeUsers can now receive proactive feedback on their code before committing. The integration of an automated fix application mechanism ( 📁 Total Files ChangedClick to Expand
🧪 Test Added/RecommendedRecommended
🔒 Security Vulnerabilities
ImplementationThe feature follows an asynchronous request-poll pattern. The backend uses the Git CLI to generate a unified diff of uncommitted changes (including untracked files via a manual diff generator). The Screenshots
How to Test
Get in TouchAxon Code Discord: @engineering_team |
![matter-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/474549?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧪 PR Review is completed: The implementation of the AI Code Review service is solid, but there are some performance and code quality issues. The polling mechanism in the UI is too aggressive, and there is redundant logic in the Git change detection.
Skipped files
CHANGELOG.md: Skipped file patternREADME.md: Skipped file pattern
⬇️ Low Priority Suggestions (1)
src/core/kilocode/api/codeReviewService.ts (1 suggestion)
Location:
src/core/kilocode/api/codeReviewService.ts(Lines 90-93)🔵 Code Quality
Issue: The
attemptvariable is incremented but never used in the polling logic.Fix: Remove the unused variable.
Impact: Cleans up unused code.
- let attempt = 0 - - while (Date.now() - startTime < this.MAX_POLLING_DURATION) { - attempt++ + const startTime = Date.now() + + while (Date.now() - startTime < this.MAX_POLLING_DURATION) {
| // Set up periodic checking for changes (every 5 seconds) | ||
| const interval = setInterval(() => { | ||
| vscode.postMessage({ type: "getGitChangesForReview" }) | ||
| }, 5000) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟠 Performance
Issue: Polling for git changes every 5 seconds using setInterval can be resource-intensive, especially for large repositories where git diff is slow. This runs unconditionally even if the user is not interacting with the review panel.
Fix: Increase the polling interval to a less aggressive value (e.g., 15 seconds) to reduce system load.
Impact: Improves performance and reduces background CPU usage.
| // Set up periodic checking for changes (every 5 seconds) | |
| const interval = setInterval(() => { | |
| vscode.postMessage({ type: "getGitChangesForReview" }) | |
| }, 5000) | |
| // Set up periodic checking for changes (every 15 seconds) | |
| const interval = setInterval(() => { | |
| vscode.postMessage({ type: "getGitChangesForReview" }) | |
| }, 15000) |
| for (const file of untrackedFilter) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const content = await fs.readFile(file.absolutePath, "utf8") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔴 Stability
Issue: The code reads the entire content of untracked files into memory to generate diffs. If an untracked file is very large (e.g., a large log file or binary), this could cause high memory usage or crash the extension.
Fix: Add a file size check before reading the content and skip files that are too large (e.g., > 1MB).
Impact: Prevents potential Out-Of-Memory errors and improves stability.
| for (const file of untrackedFilter) { | |
| try { | |
| const content = await fs.readFile(file.absolutePath, "utf8") | |
| for (const file of untrackedFilter) { | |
| try { | |
| const stats = await fs.stat(file.absolutePath) | |
| if (stats.size > 1024 * 1024) continue // Skip large files > 1MB | |
| const content = await fs.readFile(file.absolutePath, "utf8") |
|
/matterai fix |
|
❌ I couldn't generate code fixes for this PR. This might be because the review comments don't require code changes, or the AI couldn't determine the appropriate fixes. |
|
Note PR Review SkippedPR review skipped as no relevant changes found due to large diff hunk OR part of a non-reviewable file. 📄Files skipped in review
💡Tips to use MatterAICommand List
|
|
Note PR Review SkippedPR review skipped as no relevant changes found due to large diff hunk OR part of a non-reviewable file. 📄Files skipped in review
💡Tips to use MatterAICommand List
|
No description provided.