Add new Configuration file CodeRabbit YAML , for automated code quality enforcement#591
Add new Configuration file CodeRabbit YAML , for automated code quality enforcement#591aniket866 wants to merge 1 commit intoAOSSIE-Org:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
217-217: Redundant single-extension brace expansion in glob patterns
{py}and{sol}are single-element sets — the braces add no value and can confuse glob parsers that don't support brace expansion.🔧 Suggested fix
- - path: "**/*.{py}" + - path: "**/*.py"- - path: "**/*.test.{sol}" + - path: "**/*.test.sol"Also applies to: 260-260
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 217, The glob entries using single-element brace expansion (e.g., the path pattern "**/*.{py}" referenced in the diff) are redundant and may break parsers that don't support braces; replace those patterns with plain extensions like "**/*.py" (and similarly change "**/*.{sol}" to "**/*.sol") in the .coderabbit.yaml entries (refer to the path key lines shown in the diff) so the glob is simpler and universally supported.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 7-8: The YAML flag early_access is set to true while the inline
comment says no early-access features are used; either change early_access: true
to early_access: false to align with the comment, or update the comment to list
which experimental CodeRabbit feature(s) are intentionally enabled (referencing
the early_access key) so the file and comment are consistent.
- Around line 249-257: The test-file glob "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" currently
applies instructions that reference `@testing-library/react-native` which
conflicts with the web-only stack; update the YAML so web test files use
`@testing-library/react` (or `@testing-library/user-event`) and only apply
`@testing-library/react-native` to native-specific test globs (e.g., separate
mobile test pattern), by splitting or scoping the existing
"**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" entry into distinct entries and changing the library
reference in the web-scoped instructions accordingly.
- Around line 67-68: The YAML setting request_changes_workflow is currently true
which triggers formal "Request Changes" reviews that block PRs; to make feedback
non-blocking change request_changes_workflow to false and update the adjacent
comment text to correctly state that false "just leaves comments" while true
submits a request-changes review and auto-approves after fixes, ensuring the
behavior and comment are consistent with the intended workflow.
- Around line 152-165: Replace the invalid top-level reviews.instructions block
with a reviews.path_instructions entry that uses a catch-all glob to apply the
same rules; specifically remove or rename the existing reviews.instructions and
add a reviews.path_instructions array containing an object with path: "**/*" and
instructions: (the bullet list currently under reviews.instructions — spelling
checks, TODO/FIXME handling, copyright year checks, duplication detection,
comment style guidance, etc.) so the rules are recognized by the CodeRabbit
schema and applied globally.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 217: The glob entries using single-element brace expansion (e.g., the
path pattern "**/*.{py}" referenced in the diff) are redundant and may break
parsers that don't support braces; replace those patterns with plain extensions
like "**/*.py" (and similarly change "**/*.{sol}" to "**/*.sol") in the
.coderabbit.yaml entries (refer to the path key lines shown in the diff) so the
glob is simpler and universally supported.
| # Enable experimental features (currently not using any specific early_access features) | ||
| early_access: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
early_access: true contradicts the inline comment
The comment states "currently not using any specific early_access features," yet the flag is set to true, which opts the repository into experimental/unstable CodeRabbit behaviors. Either set this to false if no early-access features are intentionally used, or update the comment to describe which early-access feature is being leveraged.
🔧 Suggested fix
-# Enable experimental features (currently not using any specific early_access features)
-early_access: true
+# Disable experimental features until a specific early-access feature is needed
+early_access: false📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Enable experimental features (currently not using any specific early_access features) | |
| early_access: true | |
| # Disable experimental features until a specific early-access feature is needed | |
| early_access: false |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 7 - 8, The YAML flag early_access is set to
true while the inline comment says no early-access features are used; either
change early_access: true to early_access: false to align with the comment, or
update the comment to list which experimental CodeRabbit feature(s) are
intentionally enabled (referencing the early_access key) so the file and comment
are consistent.
| # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments) | ||
| request_changes_workflow: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
request_changes_workflow: true does not "just leave comments" — it actively blocks PRs
The inline comment misrepresents this setting. With true, CodeRabbit submits a formal "Request Changes" review whenever it finds issues, which blocks merging until all comments are resolved, at which point CodeRabbit auto-approves. "Just leave comments" is the behavior of false (the default), which posts comments without submitting a request-changes review or auto-approving.
If the intent is non-blocking feedback, set this to false:
🔧 Suggested fix (non-blocking mode)
- # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments)
- request_changes_workflow: true
+ # Do not block PRs; CodeRabbit leaves comments without requesting changes or auto-approving
+ request_changes_workflow: false🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 67 - 68, The YAML setting
request_changes_workflow is currently true which triggers formal "Request
Changes" reviews that block PRs; to make feedback non-blocking change
request_changes_workflow to false and update the adjacent comment text to
correctly state that false "just leaves comments" while true submits a
request-changes review and auto-approves after fixes, ensuring the behavior and
comment are consistent with the intended workflow.
| # Review instructions that apply to all files | ||
| instructions: >- | ||
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | ||
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | ||
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | ||
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | ||
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed | ||
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | ||
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | ||
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | ||
| - Look for code duplication | ||
| - Suggest code completions when: | ||
| - seeing a TODO comment | ||
| - seeing a FIXME comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, examine the .coderabbit.yaml file to understand its structure
cat -n .coderabbit.yaml | head -170Repository: AOSSIE-Org/website
Length of output: 7258
🌐 Web query:
CodeRabbit schema reviews instructions YAML configuration
💡 Result:
To configure review “instructions” in CodeRabbit’s .coderabbit.yaml (in the repo root), you typically use these fields:
- Global tone/style for all outputs
tone_instructions: "<text>"(docs.coderabbit.ai)
- PR high-level summary instructions
reviews.high_level_summary_instructions: "<text>"(docs.coderabbit.ai)
- Auto-generated PR title instructions
reviews.auto_title_instructions: "<text>"(docs.coderabbit.ai)
- Path-specific review instructions (most “schema-like” way to scope instructions)
reviews.path_instructions: - path: "<glob>" instructions: "<text>"(docs.coderabbit.ai)
- Label suggestion instructions
reviews.labeling_instructions: - label: "<label>" instructions: "<text>"(docs.coderabbit.ai)
Minimal example:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
tone_instructions: "Be concise. Prefer actionable bullets."
reviews:
high_level_summary_instructions: "Write release notes as 5 bullets."
auto_title_instructions: "Use Conventional Commits."
path_instructions:
- path: "**/*.sql"
instructions: "Check indexes, migrations safety, and query plans."
- path: "infra/**"
instructions: "Flag security risks and least-privilege issues."
labeling_instructions:
- label: "security"
instructions: "Use when auth, secrets, or access control change."
``` ([docs.coderabbit.ai](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/getting-started/yaml-configuration))
Citations:
- 1: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration/
- 2: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration/
- 3: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration/
- 4: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration/
- 5: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration/
- 6: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/getting-started/yaml-configuration
---
🌐 Web query:
`CodeRabbit path_instructions configuration documentation`
💡 Result:
`path_instructions` is documented in CodeRabbit’s **Configuration Reference** under **`path_instructions` (array of objects)** with two fields: `path` (glob) and `instructions` (text guidance). It’s used to add **path-specific guidance for code review**. [1]
Example `.coderabbit.yaml` (from the Initial configuration guide):
```yaml
path_instructions:
- path: "src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}"
instructions: "Review React.js, TypeScript, JavaScript code for best practices..."The guide also clarifies that Path instructions are direct review instructions (how to review), and not pointers to guideline files; for standards from files, use Code Guidelines instead. [2]
Related: path_instructions also exists under code generation sections (e.g., docstrings / unit tests) for path-scoped generation rules. [1]
Sources: [1] CodeRabbit Configuration Reference, [2] CodeRabbit Initial configuration guide.
reviews.instructions is not a recognized schema field and will be silently ignored
The official CodeRabbit configuration documentation does not include reviews.instructions as a valid field. The schema only recognizes path-scoped review instructions through reviews.path_instructions (with path and instructions properties). The general review instructions here—copyright year checks, TODO/FIXME handling, duplication checks, spelling verification, and comment style guidance—will not take effect.
Migrate to reviews.path_instructions using a catch-all glob:
🔧 Suggested fix
- # Review instructions that apply to all files
- instructions: >-
- - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
- - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
- - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
- - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
- - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
- - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
- - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
- - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
- - Look for code duplication
- - Suggest code completions when:
- - seeing a TODO comment
- - seeing a FIXME comment
# Custom review instructions for specific file patterns
path_instructions:
+ # Instructions that apply to all files
+ - path: "**"
+ instructions: |
+ - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
+ - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
+ - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
+ - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
+ - Confirm that copyright years are up-to-date whenever a file is changed
+ - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
+ - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
+ - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
+ - Look for code duplication
+ - Suggest code completions when seeing a TODO or FIXME comment🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 152 - 165, Replace the invalid top-level
reviews.instructions block with a reviews.path_instructions entry that uses a
catch-all glob to apply the same rules; specifically remove or rename the
existing reviews.instructions and add a reviews.path_instructions array
containing an object with path: "**/*" and instructions: (the bullet list
currently under reviews.instructions — spelling checks, TODO/FIXME handling,
copyright year checks, duplication detection, comment style guidance, etc.) so
the rules are recognized by the CodeRabbit schema and applied globally.
| - path: "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" | ||
| instructions: | | ||
| Review test files for: | ||
| - Comprehensive coverage of component behavior | ||
| - Proper use of @testing-library/react-native | ||
| - Async behavior is properly tested | ||
| - Accessibility testing is included | ||
| - Test descriptions are sufficiently detailed to clarify the purpose of each test | ||
| - The tests are not tautological |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@testing-library/react-native clashes with the web-only context declared elsewhere
The **/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} glob covers all JS/TS test files, but the broader TypeScript/JS instructions at Line 170 describe a purely web stack (Next.js, SPA, PWA, Node.js). @testing-library/react-native is the mobile library; for web test files, the correct library is @testing-library/react (or @testing-library/user-event). Leaving this as-is will direct CodeRabbit to flag missing React Native imports in web tests.
🔧 Suggested fix
- - Proper use of `@testing-library/react-native`
+ - Proper use of `@testing-library/react` (or `@testing-library/user-event` for interaction events)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - path: "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" | |
| instructions: | | |
| Review test files for: | |
| - Comprehensive coverage of component behavior | |
| - Proper use of @testing-library/react-native | |
| - Async behavior is properly tested | |
| - Accessibility testing is included | |
| - Test descriptions are sufficiently detailed to clarify the purpose of each test | |
| - The tests are not tautological | |
| - path: "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" | |
| instructions: | | |
| Review test files for: | |
| - Comprehensive coverage of component behavior | |
| - Proper use of `@testing-library/react` (or `@testing-library/user-event` for interaction events) | |
| - Async behavior is properly tested | |
| - Accessibility testing is included | |
| - Test descriptions are sufficiently detailed to clarify the purpose of each test | |
| - The tests are not tautological |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 249 - 257, The test-file glob
"**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" currently applies instructions that reference
`@testing-library/react-native` which conflicts with the web-only stack; update
the YAML so web test files use `@testing-library/react` (or
`@testing-library/user-event`) and only apply `@testing-library/react-native` to
native-specific test globs (e.g., separate mobile test pattern), by splitting or
scoping the existing "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" entry into distinct entries and
changing the library reference in the web-scoped instructions accordingly.
1 participant
Addressed Issues:
Closes
Screenshots/Recordings:
Checklist
AI Usage Disclosure
Check one of the checkboxes below:
I have used the following AI models and tools: TODO
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact.
Summary by CodeRabbit