refactor: cleanup batch_pipe_double_words procedure#2535
Open
partylikeits1983 wants to merge 2 commits intoajl-reorient-claim-note-flowfrom
Open
refactor: cleanup batch_pipe_double_words procedure#2535partylikeits1983 wants to merge 2 commits intoajl-reorient-claim-note-flowfrom
batch_pipe_double_words procedure#2535partylikeits1983 wants to merge 2 commits intoajl-reorient-claim-note-flowfrom
Conversation
partylikeits1983
changed the title
batch_pipe_double_words procedure
partylikeits1983
added
agglayer
12 tasks
partylikeits1983
added
the
no changelog
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR refactors the
batch_pipe_double_wordsprocedure. Completely resolves #2237The motivation of this PR is to remove the unnecessary writing of
PROOF_DATAinto memory inside the agglayer bridge account context. SincePROOF_DATAis already in theAdviceMapand is not needed to be in memory inside the bridge account context, it is unnecessary to write it to memory.